10.25.09

More Philosophy Now

Posted in Books and Film, Philosophy, Publishing News tagged , , , , , at 4:27 pm by ndichario

Phil1009_covThe new issue of Philosophy Now magazine (Sept./Oct. 09) is available. The issue is dedicated to existentialism, and in it you’ll find my review of Revolutionary Road, the film, mostly, but also Richard Yates’ incredible novel, which I couldn’t resist talking about as well.

I’ve copied in the full text of my review here, but I encourage you to buy the magazine. There are a number of terrific articles for all of us parlor existentialists to enjoy. It’s a great issue.

Revolutionary Road

Nick DiChario asks if it’s existential, or just depressing.

All April Wheeler wants is for her husband Frank to shut up. Chances are you’ve felt a similar frustration. You suffer a setback in life – not your run-of-the-mill disappointment, but a game-changer, one of those epic collapses that forces you to take a long, hard look at who you are and what it means to be alive in a world that has turned against you; a moment that makes you reassess a life-long dream and decide whether it’s time to give up on it for good – and you just need a little time and space to think it through.

This is exactly where April is in the opening scene of Revolutionary Road, the film based on Richard Yates’ classic 1961 existential novel. April always wanted to be an actress, and she went to acting school before she met Frank. When she joined the local production of The Petrified Forest, it was mostly to remind herself of her former life, to rediscover the flame that once burned brightly inside her. Connecticut isn’t exactly Broadway, but for a woman of thirty-something, mother of two, opening night at the high school was a big deal. If she had performed admirably – if she had gotten a standing ovation, or even a sincere round of applause – it might have been enough to justify her existence. But she was awful – so awful that she knew she would never act again, and most likely had no talent to begin with. Although this scene is passed over quickly in the film, Yates gives it a good measure of attention in his novel. It is an important moment, a moment in April’s life when desire runs hard up against truth and comes out the worst for it. Frank does his best to console her, make her feel better about her failure; but all she really wants him to do is shut the hell up so she can think, put it all in perspective and rearrange her psyche to cope with the death of her dream. Not too much to ask for – but Frank is incapable of giving it. During the ride home the couple argue violently, each saying things they know will deeply hurt the other. Welcome to the lives of Frank and April Wheeler.

 

Sam Mendes

Sam Mendes

Revolutionary Road is directed by Sam Mendes (Jarhead, Road to Perdition, American Beauty), who makes the most of Justin Haythe’s inspired screenplay. Viewers follow the Wheelers from setback to setback as the unhappy couple readjust and compromise their dreams of living interesting, artistic, avant garde lives, and conform to the standard roles of husband and wife, just like all the other husbands and wives in the falsely idyllic suburb in which they live. They always imagined themselves better than the rest; but this illusion fades before their eyes and ours as the film inches forward. Frank once laughed at his father for toiling his life away as a salesman for Knox Business Machines, but through a cruel twist of fate, Frank ends up working for the same company, toiling in much the way his father had toiled. Every time reality becomes too much for the Wheelers, they fight. The kids they never wanted; the job that’s stealing Frank’s best years; the dreadfully boring existence of a housewife… neither of them asked for this life (did they?) – and yet both of them are living it, hating each other for it in their own small ways, and denying one of the most important tenants of existentialism – taking responsibility. Their fights lead to affairs, their affairs to fights. Time and again April asks Frank to shut up because she doesn’t want to talk about it; and Frank, who loves April and is terrified that at any moment she might leave him, can’t stop talking. Their relationship is built on needs not met, and through the first half of the film there seems to be no way out. But is there a way out after all? April comes up with an idea, another potential game-changer.

Leo_kateApril is the real star of this story. Without her inner torment there would be no existential conflict. April decides to take control, to meet the enemy head on. Existentialism is concerned with the freedom of choice and what one does with it. It tells us that we are not only fundamentally free to choose, but obligated to make authentic choices. To choose authentically means we are individually responsible to undertake the challenge of continually creating ourselves. This existentialist responsibility is too often misunderstood as dark, moody, and just plain depressing, when in fact it is a call to action, what Sartre describes as “the sternness of our optimism.” After years of denial April finally sees her responsibility for her own life and understands that she and Frank have not been true to themselves. She comes up with a plan to go to Europe “for good.” Frank was stationed in Paris during his stint in the military, it’s the only place he ever talked about returning to, so April decides they must move there. She sees this as her chance to change their course, set things aright. She discovers that she can make good money as a secretary for NATO, or in any number of government agencies overseas. Frank can then, finally, take some time off and discover what he really wants to do with his life. “Don’t you see?” April begs, “You’ll be reading and studying and taking long walks and thinking… For the first time in your life you’ll have time to find out what it is you want to do, and when you find it you’ll have the time and the freedom to start doing it.” Paris is Shangri-La, and if she can convince Frank of this they’ll leave the wretched burbs behind forever. But be prepared, there is a problem, and the viewer can see it coming from a mile away. Only April doesn’t see what is obvious to us: the plan instantly frightens Frank. For all his brave talk, he seems to fit the role of coward just fine. He says he despises his job, but appears to find comfort in it. He claims to be disenchanted with the dull routine of his days, but discovers relief in the tedium, in the daily ride on the train, in the office banter, and in the meaningless affair with the secretary.

Make no mistake, this is the stuff of existentialism, and existentialism is perhaps best served on a literary plate. Many seminal works of existentialism can be found in the stories and plays of Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Franz Kafka, Albert Camus, Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir. But rarely do dramatic works of existentialism translate well into film, especially of the Hollywood blockbuster type. The internal monologues; the ruminating, self-evaluation and angst; the subtle things that make living in the world absurd, have all produced great literature, but not always riveting cinema. Mendes, however, pulls it off through an intuition for picking the dramatic scenes from Yates’ novel and squeezing the intensity out of each one – the bitter fights, the horrible things the characters say and do to each other, the affairs, April’s clumsy attempt at aborting her unexpected pregnancy… Mendes lets us become intimate voyeurs, and in this way breathes a certain kind of awful life into the film. Even the tortured and psychotic John Givings is used mercilessly to shine a light on the protagonists’ flaws. John at first admires the Wheelers for their plan to escape to Paris; but when he learns that they’ve abandoned the idea he becomes distraught and demands to know why. Frank tells him that April is pregnant – a shock to them both, they hadn’t planned on it, but “suppose we say that people anywhere aren’t very well advised to have babies unless they can afford them. As it happens, the only way we can afford this one is by staying here. It’s a question of money, you see.” He explains this to the psychologically-damaged John as if he’s explaining it to a five-year-old rather than to an adult who once had a brilliant career as a mathematician. But John is not so easily convinced. Money is an excuse, not a reason, and he lets Frank know this: “Don’t people have babies in Europe?… What’s the real reason? You get cold feet, or what? You decide you like it here after all? You figure it’s more comfy here in the old Hopeless Emptiness, or – Wow, that did it! Look at his face! What’s the matter, Wheeler? Am I getting warm?” It’s a brutally honest scene, and the most damning in the film: the patient out of the psychiatric ward on a half-day pass is the only one who has the courage to speak the truth.

It’s an existential wake-up call, but it comes too late to stop the downward spiral of events that lead to the tragic climax. Everything has already been set in motion. April has missed her window of opportunity for a safe abortion, and Frank is responsible for the cold, calculated dismantling of their dream. In the end, the Wheelers suffer not from what they perceive to be the trap society has set for them, but from refusing to act.

 

Rev_road_covRevolutionary Road is a brilliant novel, and I highly recommend the film. You won’t often get a chance to see good existentialism on the big screen. In fact, I have not seen a better attempt since Lo Straniero (1967), based on Albert Camus’ The Stranger. To his credit, Mendes is unfailingly faithful to the novel, picking up on the high-drama points of Yates’ story and paying attention to the nuances. Kate Winslet as April and Leonardo DiCaprio as Frank play their parts magnificently. The minor characters are wonderful as well, especially Kathy Bates as the well-intentioned and irritating Mrs Givings, the real estate agent who sells the Wheelers’ their house on Revolutionary Road.

There is no ‘tosh’ (the word Virginia Woolf was fond of using for frivolous or silly writing) in this tale of self-inflicted wounds. In his famous lecture Existentialism Is A Humanism, Sartre tells us that people must take responsibility for themselves, whatever the situation: “We are alone, without excuses. That is what I mean when I say that man is condemned to be free.” Yates seemed to have been intimately aware of this. He struggled as an author, and never achieved great success or notoriety in his lifetime, suffering acute alcoholism, and mental problems which sent him to a psychiatric ward. This novel is about the truth of human experience, and Yates’ life experiences were pretty ugly. Perhaps the anguish of his own life allowed him to read between the lines of his generation and identify what was ailing it. He used his personal adversity to feed his work and wrote through it all with a clear, sharp, realism that wasn’t appreciated nearly enough in his day. I first read this novel in college and thought it was okay, although a bit boring. It’s amazing what thirty years of perspective can do for a work of art… I have more of an appreciation and sympathy for Yates’ personal sufferings now, and the obvious influences they had on this classic story of disappointment and loss in America. He expertly pulls apart the social order and how we all compromise ourselves to death behind a veneer of cozy acquiescence. Although set in the post-WWII era, it could just as well have been written today.

I can understand why the story might have seemed dull when I was a kid in college; but today, after having inevitably lived some of the disillusionment Yates wrote about, it’s a whole new disturbing ball game. There must have been times when, much like his character April, Yates just wanted everyone to shut up so he could put it all in perspective. In the final scene of the book, and as the film fades to black, in one of the few humorous moments in an otherwise uncompromisingly relentless tale of existential angst, April finally gets her wish.

© Nick DiChario 2009

Nick DiChario was nominated for the Hugo and World Fantasy awards. His novels A Small and Remarkable Life (2006) and Valley of Day-Glo (2008) are published by Robert J. Sawyer Books.

Subscribe to Philosophy Now, one of the coolest magazines in the universe.

10.19.09

There Isn’t Enough Time to Read All the Books I Want to Read!

Posted in Books and Film tagged , , , , at 12:40 am by ndichario

Two More Authors to Read and Keep Reading

Victor Pelevin and Jack Vance

InsectsFriend and fellow writer Chadwick Ginther loaned me his copy of Victor Pelevin’s The Life of Insects. We’d been chatting about the author, and I’d mentioned that Pelevin was one of those writers I’d recently heard a lot about but hadn’t had a chance to read. I knew a little of Pelevin, that he was a Russian author who liked to mess outside the lines of realism and mix philosophy and pop culture and other weirdness into his stories. Basically, just the kind of stuff I love. Even though I was expecting a strange bit of literary smoke, it took me awhile to get into the book. Were the visiting American and his two Russian acquaintances really mosquitoes? Who (or what) was Marina? A flying ant? And what could possibly be running through the head of a young dung beetle other than his black sphere? I soon discovered that the trick to mastering this book was to simply give in to it and let the prose and the odd bits of philosophical observations carry me into the lives and stories of the people-insects. Once I realized that Pelevin’s characters were not humans transforming into insects (or vice versa) but they were both humans and insects at the same time, living in both worlds, this one and that one, I stopped worrying about the details and simply became one with the music he was playing. Take, for example, this completely bizarre love scene between Sam and Natasha:

“Sam felt his proboscis straightening up under Natasha’s dexterous hands, and he looked ecstatically into her eyes. A long dark tongue with a shaggy tip divided into two short hairy branches hung from her jaw. The tongue shuddered in excitement, and dark green drops of thick secretion tricked down it. ‘Eat me,’ whispered Natasha, tugging on the antennae protruding from beneath Sam’s eyes, and he buzzed and groaned as his proboscis crunched through the green chitin of her back…”

Are you kidding me? That’s great stuff. And as the short novel crawls and digs and buzzes and flies and hums forward, you begin to see more and more how the lives of humans and insects are strangely similar, how we, much like insects, are driven by instinct and hope and absurdity and our inescapable social structures. The book is disorienting, clever, poetic, and sophisticated, and you can’t help but think of the Russian tradition of political allegory as you read along. Highly Recommended.

Jack Vance

Jack Vance

I’m the first to admit that I have not read nearly enough of the sf classic authors. One of those authors is Jack Vance, generally considered among the very best writers in the field, winner of the Hugo and Nebula and World Fantasy awards, not to mention the Grand Master. There was a great article about Vance in the NY Times Magazine back in July 09 written by Carlo Rotella, in which a number of popular authors were quoted as having been influenced by Vance during their early teen years, including guys like Neil Gaiman, Dan Simmons, and Michael Chabon. 

So when I happened upon The Languages of Pao in the library, I decided to mend my ways. Although the book was originally published in the 1950s, I found it to be a great read and none the worse for wear. How often have you read a science fiction novel where the central conceit is linguistics? The book has interplanetary politics and intrigue, an assassination plot, and a powerful story of loyalty, homesickness, and survival. The young protagonist and heir to the throne of Pao, Beran Panasper, is just a boy when his father is murdered. He is spirited away to the planet Breakness to spare his life, where he is educated and taught many languages, and given the tools he will need to one day reclaim his rightful place on Pao. Vance is one of the cherished few sf stylists, and this book, not surprisingly, will pull you in with its wonderful language. I understand that The Dragon Masters is a must read. Many of Vance’s books have been republished and are still available and reasonably priced. If anyone has a favorite, let me know. I’m up for more. Highly recommended.

Of further interest…

More books by Victor Pelevin.

Jack Vance’s biblio.

10.07.09

Inglorious Bookstore

Posted in Books and Film tagged , , , , , at 12:06 pm by ndichario

Here are all the books that remain almost three years after the demise of my once proud and beloved bookstore. Eight grocery bags. They will soon be donated to the local library. All good things must come to an end. Sigh. (There’s that darn cat again.)

WC09 038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inglorious Basterds. Well, heck, just go see it. The movie is brilliant. Forget that it’s Quentin Tarantino, purge all your preconceptions, ignore everything you’ve heard and read about the film, and just go see the darn thing. It’s a great film filled with incredible performances and truly creative madness, part action-adventure, part pulp-fiction, part alternate history. It’s a compelling story and a gift to the imagination. Partake. Yes, it won the Palme d’Or at CannesHighly recommended. (Inglorious Basterds official movie website.)

I caught Odd Man Out, a classic brit noir, at the Dryden Theatre at the George Eastman House last week. Although director Carol Reed is best known for his masterwork The Third Man (based on Graham Greene’s novel), I honestly think Odd Man Out is a better picture. It’s a tour de force by actor James Mason, who plays an IRA soldier wounded and on the run from Belfast police. The film will keep you riveted for the entire 116 minutes, and the ending is nothing shy of brilliant. My apologies to those of you who don’t have the Dryden Theatre in your hometown. I know it sucks. But rent Odd Man Out if you can, or watch it online. Highly recommended.

James Mason in Odd Man Out

James Mason in Odd Man Out

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of further interest…

Graham Greene writes about The Third Man

09.30.09

Thin Air, Fine Time

Posted in Books and Film, Writing Life tagged , , , , , at 12:22 pm by ndichario

As you might expect, I had an incredible time at Thin Air. This week long literary festival was a big fat deal in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and rightly so. One of the main events for SF fans was Thursday night, Sept. 24, when the premier of FlashForward aired on ABC TV, based on Rob Sawyer’s fabulous novel. McNally Robinson at Polo Park cleared out a corner of its store, rented a monster-size movie screen, and threw a huge viewing party. 120 or so peeps showed up to help Rob celebrate opening night. Here are some pics from the event.

Rob introducing the show just before air time…

WC09 029

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rob and his wife Carolyn Clink…

WC09 026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Karen Dudley and her dad chillin’ out before the show…

WC09 025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A happy crowd! Author Bev Geddes up front next to SF icon Robert Charles Wilson…

WC09 023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author Robert Charles Wilson with his wife Sharry…

WC09 034

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rob signing books after the show…

WC09 030

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The festival lasted all week, and I made it to a number of events and had a fine time. In addition to Rob’s premier party, on Friday morning I went to Glenlawn Collegiate high school and ran through some creative writing exercises with the kids. Yes, even ninth graders can concentrate! Here’s the proof as they scribble away during a free-write…

WC09 037

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday afternoon, Rob and Bob and I sat on a panel about “the future” at the University of Winnipeg. That night was the SF event on the Mainstage dowtown at “the Forks.” All three of us read excerpts from our novels and answered questions afterwards. My darn camera battery ran out of juice, so I didn’t get any pictures, but if anyone passes some of theirs along to me I’ll post them later. All in all, the week’s events reminded me of how great it can feel to be an author. Canada sure knows how to treat its writers! I was thrilled to be included. Thanks to Rob, Robert J. Sawyer Books, and Fitzhenry and Whiteside for helping me make it happen.

Of further interest…

Robert J. Sawyer’s website.

Variety reviews FlashForward.

USA Today reviews FlashForward.

Robert Charles Wilson’s website.

09.12.09

2 Bizarre-O 9s

Posted in Books and Film tagged , , , , , at 10:48 am by ndichario

9movie9
I hadn’t really planned on seeing the movie 9 on 9.9.09, but it just so happened that I was having coffee near the theater, and I finished talking with my friends right on time for the movie. I knew I wanted to see it sooner or later, so I went ahead and took myself to the show. For the most part I think it’s fun entertainment. Shane Acker’s animation is terrific, and those strange little doll-like characters, numbers 1 through 9, with their tiny zippered bodies and vulnerable personalities, are oddly adorable, a bit like big-eyed Muppets. If you can forget all about the cliché-ridden, even senseless story at times, you might enjoy the spectacle of it. But honestly, it’s hard to forget about the cliché-ridden, senseless story. Once again humans have been destroyed by their machines. Once again science has turned against us. Once again only a few living things remain to save…well…to save what? There actually aren’t anymore people left, and those little dolls can’t procreate, so what’s the point? And how is it that these little foot-long hotdogs manage to destroy the evil machine-monsters when billions of humans couldn’t swing it? Maybe we just weren’t small enough? It makes me wonder how involved the normally inventive Tim Burton was in this project. I’m guessin’ not very. Ah, well. Switch off your brain and enjoy the show. I rate this film and upside down 9: Mildly recommended.

D9

Sharlto Copley as Wikus

D-9
If you want to see a much better 9, try District 9 (D-9). Written and directed by Neill Blomkamp, this is a fine science fiction film. Well, it starts out as a science fiction film, then it morphs into a socio-political statement, and then there’s more than a wee bit of fantasy and horror mixed in. Anyway you slice it, the movie puts an interesting spin on the age-old science fiction theme of first contact. How would we really react if a gigantic space ship stalled in the sky over Johannesburg? Neill actually gives this question some serious play in the movie. There may be some familiar tropes here — the prawn-like aliens; the evil, giant corporation doing dirty deeds; the one guy somehow overcoming an army of military nasties trying to kill him — but the documentary-style storytelling feels fresh, although reminiscent of Cloverfield, (reviewed previously). Sharlto Copley’s performance as the bumbling Multi-National United employee named Wikus is nothing short of brilliant. D-9 is fast-paced and suspenseful: a little splatter-punk, a touch of poli-sci commentary, some scary alien stuff, and a pinch of allegory for good measure (remember apartheid?). And it all kinda works. I rate this film an upright 9: Highly recommended.

Of further interest…

Cloverfield 2 is on the way!

09.08.09

Chilly Summer = More Reading and Writing

Posted in Books and Film, Philosophy tagged , , , , , , , , at 11:55 pm by ndichario

3 Fine Books

Philosophy
I’m in the process of e-interviewing science fiction author Robert J. Sawyer for Philosophy Now Magazine. As I was preparing for the interview, Rob suggested I read Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence (2009), edited by Susan Schneider. This is a great book filled with essays about science fiction and its place in philosophy, and philosophy and its place in science fiction. Just about every page is interesting. You’ll find topics such as “The Matrix as Metaphysics” (David Chalmers), “Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds” (Daniel Dennett), “Superintelligence and Singularity” (Ray Kurzweil), “The Paradoxes of Time Travel” (David Lewis), and much more. It supports what many of us have known for a long time: science fiction really is a thoughtful literature. This book is now available in paperback and will truly bend your mind: Highly recommended.

Mystery
Mystery writer Andy Straka is a fellow upstate New Yorker (now living in Virginia). He’s been nominated for the Shamus, Agatha, and Anthony awards, and his first Frank Pavlicek novel A Witness Above (2001) is an excellent read. In the spirit of noir (if not dead center in the middle of it) his main character is an ex-NYPD cop with a bitter ex-wife and a troubled daughter. Frank is scraping by as a PI when his daughter Nicky suddenly ends up in jail after a brick of coke is found strapped to her car, and she’s suspected of murdering a friend. You’ll find good characters, fine writing, and lots of interesting info about falcons within these pages. Yep, that’s right, Andy is “falconry enthusiast,” and the bird bits are fascinating and fun to read. This is a fast-paced, tightly knotted mystery. If you give in to one book, I suspect you’ll want to read more: Highly Recommended.

Rothberg Project
The “Rothberg Project” continues. You may recall that I reviewed A Beast In View previously in this blog. Next on my list of Abraham Rothberg gems is The Sword of the Golem (1970). When Abe handed me this novel, he said it was the closest thing to science fiction and fantasy he’d ever written, and he thought I might like it. It’s not really science fiction or fantasy, but he was right about me liking it. It’s a hell of a book.

Set in sixteenth century Prague, the Rabbi Judah Low creates a Golem out of mud and clay. Is it magic or a miracle of God that allows him to do this? (You make the call.) It doesn’t really matter. What does matter is that it’s an unnatural act, and this one unnatural act sets the stage for the rest of the novel. The Golem struggles with the meaning of his own life as well as what it means to be human; the rabbi wrestles with his faith and with the fate of his people; and the Jews struggle with their lives in the ghetto where they suffer, for the most part, as prisoners in fear of their jailers. As each scene unfolds, the sense of impending catastrophe becomes stronger and stronger until it’s simply impossible to put down the book.

To quote the author, “The Sword of the Golem is about peace and violence, about when the sword is to be used, and when it is to be sheathed, if ever.” This is a brilliant novel and a great story. The book is no longer in print, but it can be found through online booksellers such as AbeBooks.com: Highly recommended.

Of further interest…

Some of Abe’s new work and reprints are now available through a small press by the name of Edteck. Check it out and buy with confidence!

A more detailed review of Science Fiction and Philosophy from the Metapsychology site.

The Philosophy of Science Fiction Film, edited by Steven M. Sanders.

Feminist Philosophy and Science Fiction from Prometheus Books.

Philosophy Now Magazine. Subscribe today!

08.26.09

When Pandemonium Strikes

Posted in Books and Film tagged , , , , , , at 12:34 am by ndichario

PandemonOne of the great joys I take in writing this blog is reviewing books I like by people I like. So it came to pass with Daryl Gregory’s Pandemonium.

Daryl’s story takes place in a slightly alternate universe (or maybe moderately cracked might be a better description), where demon possession is commonplace and ordinary people are often randomly seized by such pure maniacs as Smokestack Johnny, the Little Angel, the Painter, and the Captain. These demons recur like collective nightmares and bring their distinctive and destructive personalities with them wherever they light.

Although demon possession lasts only a few minutes in Daryl’s world, the pandemonium a demon can cause in such a short amount of time is off the charts. Part of the fun of this book, and part of the horror, is watching the craziness unfold when a demon jumps into an unsuspecting host. (The demon possession that occurs at O. J. Simpson’s murder trial, for example, is absolute mayhem and worth the price of admission.)

But it’s Del Pierce, the novel’s hero, to whom the reader quickly becomes attached. Del was a little boy when he was possessed by a rare demon known as the Hellion. It has been more than twenty years since the original possession, an unheard of length of time, and the main plot revolves around Del trying to figure out why this atypical possession happened to him and how he’s been able to keep the Hellion at bay for so long. He also desperately needs to get rid of the creepy little monster clawing away inside him, driving him mad, becoming stronger and stronger and threatening to completely destroy him in the process.

Pandemonium is a unique mishmash of fantasy and horror done seamlessly well. It is also a richly woven novel with compelling characters, nerve-twisting moments of suspense, and fine writing. Del’s quest for answers opens the door to the larger questions of what the demons are, how they came to be, and how they might be overcome, urging us, perhaps even against our wills, to think about our own demons in our own moderately cracked universe. 

For anyone who grew up in the golden age of Marvel Comics and the science fiction of the sixties and seventies, as I did, Daryl Gregory offers us a fair amount of well-penned homage to enjoy as well. This novel is equal parts personal journey, coming-of-age, retro-pop, humor and poignancy all rolled into one. In other words, there is something for everyone: Recommended.

Of further interest…

Pandemonium was a debut novel for Daryl. For more info about the book and the author, visit Daryl’s website.

The book was a finalist for three major awards: The Shirley Jackson Award, for best dark fantasy or horror novel, the Locus Award for best first novel, and the Mythopoeic Award, for best adult fantasy novel. Daryl also won the 2009 Crawford Award for best new fantasy writer.

08.19.09

Look, Real Honest to Goodness SF!

Posted in Books and Film tagged , , , , , at 12:56 am by ndichario

moon_movieDirector Duncan Jones‘ debut film Moon is a science fiction triumph in at least two significant ways. First, Jones takes the genre seriously, treating his milieu with the respect it deserves and trying to show what life (at least one kind of life) on the moon might actually be like. Second, this is a movie about a character, a human being. It’s not a movie about a movie, or a movie about justifying a big movie budget, or a movie about space battles or space monsters or special effects. In the true spirit of what science fiction is really all about, this is a movie about humanity.

The film opens with the main character, Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) at the end of his three-year assignment for Lunar Industries. Sam has been alone in a small lunar facility for the extent of his contract, running mining equipment and shooting canisters of Helium-3 back to Earth for the new energy industry that is powering his home planet. But with only a few weeks to go, Sam is in an accident on one of the mining rovers, and that’s when things start getting weird. Sam is rescued by…well…Sam. Who is this new Sam? Is the old Sam delusional? Has he suffered a head injury that’s causing hallucinations? Or is Sam 1 or perhaps Sam 2 a clone?

In an interview with CNN, Jones mentions that the inspiration for this film came from Robert Zubrin’s book Entering Space: Creating a Spacefaring Civilization. There is a chapter in it about harvesting Helium-3 on the moon. (I read this same book myself years ago and thought it should have been used as a blueprint for our next step in colonizing the moon.) Jones says, “It always stuck in my head as a really interesting idea. Hard science fiction, science fiction that builds out of scientific potential or extrapolating from what’s possible — that’s the science fiction I find most interesting.”

This certainly comes through in the film. Jones makes a genuine attempt to get the science right and create some semblance of scientific realism. He also establishes a dark mood and atmosphere, and there is plenty of mystery and suspense as well. Kevin Spacey’s voice as the computer GERTY is haunting in the same calm, creepy manner that Hal was in 2001: A Space Odyssey. And Jones manages all of this on an affordable budget, proving that you don’t need to break Fort Knox just to make a science fiction film.

I love to credit writers whenever I can, and the screenplay by Nathan Parker is sensational. There is a real story here, a story of isolation and alienation, grief, angst, human suffering, personal sacrifice, and loss of identity. It is a story of man and technology, the upsides and downsides of it, and what that might mean to us now and in the future. Rockwell’s performance is absolutely, positively outstanding as the two Sams, and I’m certain he’ll get Oscar attention for it — yeah, that’s right, really good acting in an sf movie. Believe it.

Duncan Jones is David Bowie’s son. I mention this last because it really doesn’t matter. Moon is a fine film in its own right. Set aside the celebrity factor and just go see it: Highly recommended.

Of further interest…

Watch the Moon trailer!

Robert Zurbin is a U of Rochester grad.

Guardian’s Top 10 list of all-time best SF films: not a bad list, with a few notable exceptions, e.g., Planet of the Apes, Dark City, Destination Moon.

08.02.09

Why Am I Talking About Snow in the Middle of Summer?

Posted in Books and Film tagged , , , , , , at 1:17 am by ndichario

SnowThe main character in Orhan Pamuk’s novel Snow is an ex-patriot Turkish poet named Ka, who has returned from Germany to the city of Kars, one of the poorest and most remote parts of the country. Islamic fundamentalism is brewing, and some young women, protesting that headscarves have been banned in school, have committed suicide. Ka has come to Kars, he tells everyone, to investigate the suicides and report on the upcoming elections for a western newspaper, but we soon learn he is on a secret, personal mission to convince Ipek, the woman of his dreams, the love of his life from his childhood, to return to Frankfurt with him so they can marry and live happily every after.

One of the great joys of reading a long, well-written novel such as Snow is that you can completely immerse yourself in it, forget that you’re reading a story at all and live inside it for a while. Through Pamuk’s unique storytelling — the narrator is an acquaintance of Ka’s telling the tale after Ka’s death — we begin to see Ka’s faults and insecurities, the political struggles between the fundamentalists and the secularists, and the deeply personal conflicts of the many characters, all of this playing out in the stunning, constant snowfall that has trapped them in the city.

Pamuk hasn’t previously been recognized as a political writer, but it’s impossible to miss the politics here, and impossible not to get involved in it. This book, published in 2004, captures the struggle that many Muslims face today in the Middle East between fundamentalism and westernization where there seems to be very little wiggle room, and it asks us to look at this issue ourselves from all of its various and complicated angles.

To me, however, some of the most interesting and certainly the most moving and poetic parts of the novel are those moments when Ka, who has been suffering writer’s block for a very long time, breaks open the dam, and inside this desolate, isolated, grand old city, begins writing poems again, the most brilliant verses he’s ever written, and he’s not just writing them, he’s literally channeling the stuff as if he were (ironically) an instrument of God.

Snow has moments of tragedy, farce, romance, unexpected turns of plot, espionage within espionage, the literal unhinging of Ka himself, and long passages of graceful prose. Don’t read this book if you’re in a hurry to get through it. Languish in it long enough to feel the extravagant melancholy, the twisting and turning digressions, the duplicity that rules every charter’s every movement, and the weight of the unrelenting snow: Highly recommended.

Of further interest…

Orhan Pamuk is generally considered Turkey’s most prominent author. In 2006 he was awarded the Nobel Prize in literature. He began gaining popularity in the U.S. with the publication of My Name is Red, winner of the International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award in 2003. You can find out more about him at his website. This author is definitely worth exploring!

Orhan Pamuk

Orhan Pamuk

07.13.09

Nurturing the Creative Soul

Posted in Books and Film, Writing Life tagged , , , , , , , , , , at 12:13 pm by ndichario

Every so often it’s good to feed your creative soul. There’s no better way to do it than spending quality time with a community of readers and writers with whom you share a common history. I’m grateful to my pal Rick Wilber for convincing me to crash with him at Readercon in Boston this past weekend. I was lucky enough to remember my camera, so here’s a quick review in pics:

My pal Ricky with Locus photo-maven and good friend Amelia Beamer.

Rick and Ameila

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I had a terrific time with my editor Robert J. Sawyer. Here we are, two happy eggheads, followed by a shot of Rob with his editor from Tor, David Hartwell, snapped on David’s 62nd birthday. They’re holding a copy of Distant Early Warnings, the brand-spankin’ new anthology of Canadian science fiction from Robert J. Sawyer Books.

Rob and Nick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Rob and David

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-time con pal, fine editor, and one of the great ladies of science fiction Ellen Datlow, captured and held hostage outside the hotel restaurant. (I released her eventually.)

Ellen and Nick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That crazy Coyote Allen Steele. After several beers, we figured out that the last time we’d seen each other was the Final Rivercon (XXV) nine years ago! Which led to another beer. Sigh.

Allen and Nick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, to confirm your suspicions, I’m taking all these closeups myself, with my trusty Kodak digi…left-handed!

Everybody loves James Patrick Kelly! Including me!

Jim and Nick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The guys from Tachyon Publications, Bernie (left) and Jacob. We had a terrific dinner together Thursday night, and then they couldn’t get rid of me. That’ll teach ‘em!

Bernie and Jacob

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Samuel R. Delaney signing autographs in the Readercon Bookshop.

Chip!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott Edelman published a couple of my stories years ago when he was editing the late-great SF Age. He’s still tall!

Scott and Nick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Definitely one of the highlights of the weekend for me was finally meeting my all-time short-story-writer-hero Howard Waldrop. After I made a complete fool of myself telling him how much I adore him, he kindly consented to this pic. Howard is one of the most weirdly original science fiction writers of our time, and he’s been a great inspiration to me. I love you, man!

Howard and Nick

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why does Daryl Gregory have that glazed look in his eyes? It’s not just because he’s standing next to Rob Sawyer. Daryl was also a nominee for the 2009 Shirley Jackson Award.

Darryl and Rob

Next page